From the Road

 
Categories Archives
Create/Edit a Blog
Blog RSS Feed

The RC Offering
From the Passenger Seat - Wednesday 26th of August 2009 12:31:24 PM
 

Was though Ron Rutan and Christy Campbells set the other day .. some dang nice crossbred heifers and a super good Angus female, gonna try to get some pictures of them before the sale. Check back you wont want to miss these ...

Sale September 5th Eaton Ohio 

Respond to this Entry  
 


Producers Can Cut Costs With Wise Bull Selections
Industry News - Wednesday 26th of August 2009 12:28:58 PM
 
Producers Can Cut Costs With Wise Bull Selections
Like the rest of the economy, producers in the agricultural sector are feeling the crunch with cattle prices down and operating costs up.
“In these times of economic difficulty, we’re all looking for ways to help improve our bottom line,” said Darrh Bullock, University of Kentucky Extension beef cattle specialist. “I’m not an economist, but it’s pretty clear to me that if you want to improve the bottom line, you have to reduce costs or increase income — or both.”
Bullock said a lot of times when cattle producers experience difficult economic times, one of the first areas they look to reduce costs is bull purchases.
“I’m all for commercial beef producers buying a bull that fits their budget,” he said. “But, you need to be careful that buying a cheap bull now won’t cost you dearly in the future.”
Bullock said producers can avoid costly decisions if they go through the proper steps to purchase a bull that fits both their budgets and their management and production needs.
One of the first things a producer should consider when purchasing a bull is calving difficulty. Bullock emphasized the importance of finding a bull that meets calving ease needs to save on veterinarian bills and other associated costs. He said producers can also affect their future feed costs by selecting the right genetic match for the environment and management flow of their operations.
“If you have minimal forage quality and/or quantity, the bull’s genetics for growth and milk should reflect that if you plan to keep replacement heifers,” Bullock said. “If you keep heifers that have high genetic potential for growth and milk, they will demand more feed to remain reproductive. If producers can’t meet that demand through forages, they may have to supplement with a large volume of costly purchased feeds to get them bred.”
Bullock said that often producers will first try to increase income by increasing the weight of their calves. Weight is important; however, it’s the total weight of calves coming off the farm that’s the main focus, not individual calf weights, he said.
“That could lead to an imbalanced situation of highly productive cows in a lowly productive environment and that will drive up costs, possibly more than the increased income,” he said. “The best way to increase total pounds produced is through improved reproductive efficiency, and the best way to improve reproductive efficiency is to properly match your bull’s productivity to the production levels of your operation.”
“The moral to this story is that the best way to contain costs and to generate more income when selecting a bull is to find the right bull for your situation, and that might not be the same as your neighbors’,” he said.
An operation with high production levels will benefit from a high-producing bull, but the same bull on a less-productive operation may cost the operator more money and income in the future.
Respond to this Entry  
 


If I were a purebred breeder
Industry News - Friday 7th of August 2009 12:18:19 PM
 

FROM DROVERS.COM

If I were a purebred breeder
By Max Thornsberry  |  Monday, June 15, 2009

Purebred-cattle breeders should be concerned with their industry’s direction. Southern Missouri supported many swine producers when I graduated from the University of Missouri in 1977. Unbeknownst to me, the swine industry would soon be destroyed by vertical integration. One purebred-Duroc breeder said, “Doc, don’t worry, those corporate guys won’t come out here in the middle of the night to farrow a sow, and they don’t want to straw-bed, castrate or vaccinate hogs. There will always be a place for us purebred breeders, and you will always have a job servicing this segment of the hog industry.”

He was wrong. By 1985 he exited the purebred Duroc business, I exited the swine veterinary business, my swine clients ceased business, and the once numerous feeder-pig auctions were gone from my part of the state.

What destroyed our swine industry in eight years? Simple. The government allowed corporations to capture the hog industry. Executives did not want to castrate, vaccinate or farrow sows, but they found willing sharecroppers to do their labor.

Some producers contracted with these corporations; built state-of-the-art confinement facilities; accepted the corporations’ pigs, feed, medicine and vaccines; and fed the pigs — not for themselves but for the corporation.

The corporations developed their own lines of breeding stock and demanded that producers feed only hogs with their corporate genetics, thus developing another corporate profit center — composite breeds. Specific genetic traits like back fat, loin eye, yield and cutability were licensed to specific composite breeds. Purebred breeders were left with no customers. Corporations further captured the hog market by limiting access to their packing plants, making it difficult to market hogs independently.

When the producers’ facilities became outdated, they were offered new contracts only if their facilities were retrofitted with new equipment. This required new loans and another seven to eight years of connection to the corporation. If efficiencies declined, the contract could be canceled. 

With no independent market, hog market reports ceased, and the concept of supply and demand ended. Corporations were uninterested in the price-per-pound of market-ready hogs. They marketed the end product — pork — directly to supermarkets.

Could this happen to registered purebred-cattle breeders? You bet. 

Corporations do not want to own land, put up hay, castrate, breed, calve-out heifers or feed cattle at 0° F. They want control over the end product and the market. In 2007, USDA’s Market Reporting Service announced that meatpackers acquired more fed cattle under captive supply arrangements than were purchased by bid or negotiation. This trend continues and fewer fed cattle are sold in a competitive market, which gives corporations control over the cattle market, just as they achieved in the hog market.

As this trend continues, purebred-cattle breeders will be the first to go out of business.

Cattle genetics are being decoded. Just as with the hog industry, corporations will demand specific genetic cattle traits. Genetic diversity is not the goal. Genetic predisposition for tenderness, loin eye, back fat, yield and quality will be required. Composite breeds with these genetics will be developed. Corporations will start by enticing top producers to use their composite breeds.

Corporations will coerce the cattle industry into this genetic trap by discounting prices for cattle that do not conform. Animal identification and source, age and process verification will be required to access export markets. Export markets will be promoted as the salvation for this newly consolidated industry. Cattle producers will have no choice but to comply. 

The market will be about yield and tenderness, not quality. Recently, prices for Choice and Select carcasses were identical. Although it costs more to achieve Choice, producer efforts to improve the percentage of Choice carcasses will be for naught.

Corporations will force restaurants to offer “Select beef only” menus and retailers to promote Select beef as superior in nutrition and tenderness.  Less fat, more protein, fewer calories and better health will be promoted. All of these ideals can be achieved through the corporations’ composite genetics.

The trend has started. If I were a purebred-cattle breeder I would be afraid, very afraid. 

Max Thornsberry, DVM, MBA, is R-CALF USA president/Region VI director.

Respond to this Entry  
 


Charolais and Crosses FOR SALE
uncategorized - Friday 7th of August 2009 09:41:00 AM
 

Great set offered for sale as a group or pick and choose. call Kevin Today

 

Respond to this Entry  
 


OHIO CATTLEMEN SUMMER MEETING
Industry News - Friday 7th of August 2009 09:32:00 AM
 
Ohio Cattlemen Invite Indiana and Kentucky Livestock Producers to Summer Meeting
You might find a few poultry, dairy, or pork producers at the Cattlemen’s Roundup planned for Aug. 29. With the growing threat from radical animal rights groups, the Ohio Cattlemen’s Association (OCA) is inviting all of the livestock industry to their summer meeting near Oxford, Ohio. With the location just a few miles from Indiana and Kentucky, they are also inviting out-of-state farmers to the event.
The event will feature two speakers who know the hidden agendas of the many animal rights groups: Wes Jamison from the University of Florida (UF) and David Martosko of the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF). Jamison has studied the animal welfare movement for nearly 20 years. The reason the animal welfare movement is having success is because society has changed. More and more people believe farm animals should be treated as well as their own pets, Jamison says.
Livestock transportation could be targeted by using the interstate commerce clause to raise the cost of transportation across state lines. Activists will want animals to lie down with access to food and water. Jamison says that message will play well to an urban audience — and to the new President and Congress.
David Martosko of the CCF says, “The Humane Society of the United States is the single biggest threat to animal agriculture that Americans have ever seen.”
Join Martosko for a frank discussion about the need for an aggressive, take-no-prisoners approach to dealing with this wealthy and dishonest organization.
Martosko is the principal expert on animal rights for the Center for Consumer Freedom, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit watchdog group. He led CCF’s launch of groundbreaking Internet web sites like PetaKillsAnimals.com, ActivistCash.com, and MercuryFacts.org.
Martosko has testified before Congress about the threat of animal rights violence and the hidden agendas of deceptive groups like the Humane Society of the United States. He has also lectured about the threat of animal-rights and eco-radicals in Europe.
The early registration deadline has been extended to Aug. 19. The special package price for anyone who is a member of a commodity group is $30 for the tours, lunch, steak dinner and entertainment. Non-members and at the door rate is only $40. For information call: 614-873-6736 or e-mail Beef@ohiobeef.org. Make checks to: Ohio Cattlemen’s Ass’n., 10600 U.S. Hwy. 42, Marysivlle, OH 43040. See the Roundup program and registration details on the web site: http://cattlemencare.net/default.aspx or www.OhioCattle.org.
Respond to this Entry  
 

 

 
 

Stock Options  I  6136 Black Road  I   West Alexandria, Ohio 45381  I  937-839-6142  I  Email Us

Kevin Mears  I  Mobile: 937-533-0169


website d
esign by EDJE Technologies